Comments on: DRM@FSF? http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/ Free Software Chicago Style: letting proprietary solutions sleep with the fishes Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:18:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: nixternal http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-121 nixternal Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:12:47 +0000 http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-121 If Plone is what they are using, then it could very well be a limitation, but it is a limitation on my digital rights in a way :D I still found it amusing though. Jordan, can we get the 32-bit code to work first? :D If Plone is what they are using, then it could very well be a limitation, but it is a limitation on my digital rights in a way :D I still found it amusing though.

Jordan, can we get the 32-bit code to work first? :D

]]> By: Jordan Wilberding http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-120 Jordan Wilberding Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:14:19 +0000 http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-120 I suppose you want your 64-bit code to work on 32-bit processors too. :) I suppose you want your 64-bit code to work on 32-bit processors too. :)

]]> By: 1052 http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-119 1052 Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:15 +0000 http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-119 Mail them about that webmaster@fsf.org Although it may be a limitation of Plone. Mail them about that webmaster@fsf.org

Although it may be a limitation of Plone.

]]> By: sharms http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-118 sharms Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:25:16 +0000 http://blog.nixternal.com/2006.11.15/drmfsf/#comment-118 Nice. :) Nice. :)

]]>